Genzyme Takeover Deal Will Fail, Predicts Bioenvision Shareholder

Genzyme’s tender offer for New York-based Bioenvision, which expires at 12:01 Monday morning, will not be approved, predicts a large Bioenvision shareholder opposed to the deal. “We’ve heard it’s fallen flat as hell,” asserts Jeffrey Davis, president of SCO Capital, a New York asset-management group focused on life sciences. SCO Capital owns roughly 13 percent of Bioenvision common stock. Davis says he is making the prediction based on communiqués with other large shareholders that indicate Genzyme will not get the approvals it needs from the holders of half of Bioenvision’s common stock. “We’ve heard that they’re not even close to getting 50 percent,” he says.

If Davis’ prediction comes true, it will mark a major setback for Genzyme. Just two days ago, after a motion filed in Delaware Court of Chancery seeking a preliminary injunction to delay the proposed acquisition was withdrawn, Genzyme put out a press release saying it anticipated the deal would be approved. This morning, Bo Piela, Genzyme’s senior director for corporate communications, told Xconomy the company was sticking to that prediction. “All I can do is refer you to the press release,” he says.

Under the terms of the deal, Cambridge-based Genzyme would take control of Bioenvision for $350 million, or $5.60 a share. The main issue for upset Bioenvision shareholders is whether the offer fairly valued the potential of the company’s leukemia drug clofarabine, which is awaiting approval by the EMEA and is predicted by some analysts to achieve sales of up to $1 billion per year.

Davis says that his service on the Bioenvision board two years ago gives him a deep knowledge of the company and what it’s worth. “It ‘s not like we’re some shareholder who does not have intimate knowledge of the drug or the company,” he asserts. “Whether or not Genzyme will ultimately take over Bioenvision is going to be based on the price,” says Davis. “Clearly, we don’t think $5.60 gets the job done, and we’re reasonably optimistic that a lot of other common shareholders agree with us.” To have a deal approved, he adds, Genzyme’s offer will have to go “significantly north of $5.60 a share.”

Echoing Davis’ sentiments, Adam Shay, an individual stockholder, became the public voice of upset shareholders earlier this month when he put up a website (www.rejectgenzymetenderoffer.com) decrying the deal as dramatically undervaluing the company. “I am just a small individual shareholder, basically appalled by the offer that the Bioenvision management and board has decided to accept from Genzyme,” Shay says. He reports that up to 200 people a day have been checking in to view his website and blog.

Today, Shay put the deal as up in the air. “I think it’s going to be pretty close. I’d assume SCO Capital has probably talked to quite a number of institutional investors, which I think is going to tilt the table one way or another. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out.”

Author: Robert Buderi

Bob is Xconomy's founder and chairman. He is one of the country's foremost journalists covering business and technology. As a noted author and magazine editor, he is a sought-after commentator on innovation and global competitiveness. Before taking his most recent position as a research fellow in MIT's Center for International Studies, Bob served as Editor in Chief of MIT's Technology Review, then a 10-times-a-year publication with a circulation of 315,000. Bob led the magazine to numerous editorial and design awards and oversaw its expansion into three foreign editions, electronic newsletters, and highly successful conferences. As BusinessWeek's technology editor, he shared in the 1992 National Magazine Award for The Quality Imperative. Bob is the author of four books about technology and innovation. Naval Innovation for the 21st Century (2013) is a post-Cold War account of the Office of Naval Research. Guanxi (2006) focuses on Microsoft's Beijing research lab as a metaphor for global competitiveness. Engines of Tomorrow (2000) describes the evolution of corporate research. The Invention That Changed the World (1996) covered a secret lab at MIT during WWII. Bob served on the Council on Competitiveness-sponsored National Innovation Initiative and is an advisor to the Draper Prize Nominating Committee. He has been a regular guest of CNBC's Strategy Session and has spoken about innovation at many venues, including the Business Council, Amazon, eBay, Google, IBM, and Microsoft.