Genzyme Takeover Bid for Bioenvision Still Alive as Special Session Adjourns For the Day

With the vote on Genzyme’s takeover bid seemingly far closer than expected, shareholders of New York-based Bioenvision adjourned a special meeting today, the company announced this afternoon. The session will resume tomorrow with the outcome apparently too close to call.

At issue is Cambridge-based Genzyme’s (NASDAQ: GENZ) $5.60-per-share offering price for Bioenvision (NASDAQ: BIVN). That price was, in effect, rejected earlier this summer when shareholders only tendered about 22 percent of outstanding shares under Genzyme’s initial tender offer, and almost all of the shares tendered at that point were from the Bioenvision board members. At today’s session, though, according to the announcement, holders of about 47 percent of “the company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock and preferred stock” had indicated their support of the merger. A simply majority vote is needed for the merger to go through.

Throughout the process, New York investment firm SCO Capital Partners, which holds about 13 percent of Bioenvision stock, has led the fight against the bid, most recently reiterating its stance on Monday. SCO said it believes Genzyme’s offer far undervalues Bioenvision and has pressed for a shakeup of the firm’s management. In July, SCO filed a letter with the SEC announcing its intention to remove two Bioenvision board members and replace them with SCO representatives. SCO also is also seeking to terminate Genzyme’s current rights to Bioenvision’s leukemia drug clofarabine.

The Associated Press reported today that Institutional Shareholder Services, a proxy advisory company owned by Riskmetrics Group, had also advised investors to reject the bid. ISS identified an offer in the $8 to $12 range as a more suitable bid for Bioenvision, according to the AP account.

Steven Rouhandeh, chairman of SCO Financial Group, was not happy with the way things went, but he was hopeful the merger would not go through. Rouhandeh said he attended the meeting and that Bioenvision’s CEO, Christopher Wood, stood up and made an announcement of the vote so far, and then adjourned the meeting. “I felt like a reporter. I tried to shout out a question. They said they weren’t taking any questions,” Rouhandeh told me this afternoon. “When will management heed the will of shareholders and call it a day?” Rouhandeh said. “You’ve gotten three no votes. How many times do we have to vote?”

Rouhandeh would not offer a prediction for the final outcome. “It shouldn’t go through and it hasn’t gone through, and we continue to hope it won’t go through because we don’t think it is in the best long-term interest of shareholders.”

Genzyme, for its part, has held fast to its offer throughout the process, which began in May. In a letter to the Bioenvision board last week, Genzyme President Mark J. Enyedy wrote that the company wanted to end any speculation that his company would raise its offer. “We believed $5.60 per share was a full and fair price for the company then, and we believe that to be the case now,” Enyedy wrote. He said the company was prepared to proceed as “an active and constructive” minority shareholder.

Bioenvision stock closed trading today at $5.43, up 18 cents. Genzyme closed up $0.07 at $67.85.

Author: Robert Buderi

Bob is Xconomy's founder and chairman. He is one of the country's foremost journalists covering business and technology. As a noted author and magazine editor, he is a sought-after commentator on innovation and global competitiveness. Before taking his most recent position as a research fellow in MIT's Center for International Studies, Bob served as Editor in Chief of MIT's Technology Review, then a 10-times-a-year publication with a circulation of 315,000. Bob led the magazine to numerous editorial and design awards and oversaw its expansion into three foreign editions, electronic newsletters, and highly successful conferences. As BusinessWeek's technology editor, he shared in the 1992 National Magazine Award for The Quality Imperative. Bob is the author of four books about technology and innovation. Naval Innovation for the 21st Century (2013) is a post-Cold War account of the Office of Naval Research. Guanxi (2006) focuses on Microsoft's Beijing research lab as a metaphor for global competitiveness. Engines of Tomorrow (2000) describes the evolution of corporate research. The Invention That Changed the World (1996) covered a secret lab at MIT during WWII. Bob served on the Council on Competitiveness-sponsored National Innovation Initiative and is an advisor to the Draper Prize Nominating Committee. He has been a regular guest of CNBC's Strategy Session and has spoken about innovation at many venues, including the Business Council, Amazon, eBay, Google, IBM, and Microsoft.