The Great Elevator Pitch Competition: You Have 60 Seconds to Convince Me to Give You a Million Dollars (or $10 Million)

boardroom message of “Lose Yourself” echoed through the auditorium. “You better lose yourself in the music, the moment, you own it. You better never let it go. You only get one shot, do not miss your chance to blow, this opportunity comes once in a lifetime yo.” (In Eminem’s biz-rap parlance “to blow” is shorthand for “to blow up” which is shorthand for “to become famous, successful, and respected within a small amount of time.” Clearly.)

The crowd loved the philosophy, but some were dubious of the practicality of the mission. “Can you really do all this in 55 seconds?” someone asked.

“Yes, absolutely,” was Aulet’s reply. “And it doesn’t mean speaking really, really fast.”

And so with the backgrounder completed, it was time for some real-life pitches. We judges came up. There were four of us: Aulet, Bill Schnoor, of the Goodwin Procter law firm, Andrew Rhodes, artistic director of the Makeshift Theatre Company, and me. We were kind of like American Idol judges. We didn’t really have a Simon. We didn’t actually have a Randy or Paula either. But other than that, it was the same. The presenters made their pitches, and then each of us gave our critique.

We heard some very intriguing, I would say compelling, ideas. Almost everybody dropped the ball at some point, stumbling over his words or forgetting an important aspect—like a clear picture of the business model. Ryan Buckley, who was pitching an online collaboration-distribution-networking-licensing service for would-be Hollywood writers and directors called scripts.com, lost his spot entirely and kind of threw up his arms in defeat. But he did it with a big smile on his face and got a rousing ovation for his efforts.

Rhodes, who was there to give feedback on delivery and posture and that kind of thing, was definitely the star of the judges’ panel. He couldn’t sit still in his chair, and each time a presentation finished he joined the pitcher front and center to provide pointers. Sometimes he trotted over, once he shuffled up shaking his head. He delivered, in a nice way, one of the best lines of the night to Buckley: “If you’re going to pitch scripts, you’re going to have to finish one.”

All the presenters scored big points in my book just by getting up. Here are some of the other highlights:

Ash Dyer’s idea was built around technology to cut by two-thirds the weight of the batteries soldiers pack on overnight missions from 24 pounds to just 8 (my math).

Breck Yunits had an idea for a business filming people as they scratched lottery tickets he would give them. His goal was to capture someone winning a million bucks. He’s already scratched 15,000 tickets and captured the joy of people winning $10,000 (or vice versa, 10K tickets and 15K in winnings—hey, we were in an elevator and I didn’t quite get that). To build drama, Yunits came over to the judge’s table and gave Rhodes a fresh ticket to scratch (he got zilch). It was fun, but as judges, we didn’t quite get the business model.

We ran out of time after just three of the four scheduled pitches. But the audience cheered for more. Which brought us to Alex Wissner-Gross, who pitched a system for enabling people to share their home WiFi networks with stores and other businesses aiming to deliver location-based advertisements—and to gain a piece of the revenue. “AWG,” as I call him, got kudos from all the judges for having the best overall pitch, but even he forgot “the ask.” That is, we all loved his pitch, but we didn’t know what he wanted—money, for us to sign up for the service, or what.

In the end, the evening’s lesson was a simple one about practice and adaptation, learning from your mistakes and getting ever-better. Good luck next Saturday. I’ll probably see you there: just waiting on my invitation to judge.

Author: Robert Buderi

Bob is Xconomy's founder and chairman. He is one of the country's foremost journalists covering business and technology. As a noted author and magazine editor, he is a sought-after commentator on innovation and global competitiveness. Before taking his most recent position as a research fellow in MIT's Center for International Studies, Bob served as Editor in Chief of MIT's Technology Review, then a 10-times-a-year publication with a circulation of 315,000. Bob led the magazine to numerous editorial and design awards and oversaw its expansion into three foreign editions, electronic newsletters, and highly successful conferences. As BusinessWeek's technology editor, he shared in the 1992 National Magazine Award for The Quality Imperative. Bob is the author of four books about technology and innovation. Naval Innovation for the 21st Century (2013) is a post-Cold War account of the Office of Naval Research. Guanxi (2006) focuses on Microsoft's Beijing research lab as a metaphor for global competitiveness. Engines of Tomorrow (2000) describes the evolution of corporate research. The Invention That Changed the World (1996) covered a secret lab at MIT during WWII. Bob served on the Council on Competitiveness-sponsored National Innovation Initiative and is an advisor to the Draper Prize Nominating Committee. He has been a regular guest of CNBC's Strategy Session and has spoken about innovation at many venues, including the Business Council, Amazon, eBay, Google, IBM, and Microsoft.