Biotech “Walks With Light,” But If We Don’t Start Explaining it Better, We’re “Cuckoo”

and has to be so due to the incredible amounts of capital required to move science ahead. Society appreciates the concept of new drug development until the drug is actually on the market, and someone has to pay for it. And the price of the drug has to capture the investment that went into it, the cost of earlier failures getting to success, the cost of delivering it, and a return to those investors who put the money up in the first place. And this is where, after all the work and risk to get the drug to market, we really screw up.

We’ve done an incredibly poor job at explaining to the world what we do, how it is done, what the challenges are, and what the impact is. It’s easy to feel that our job is to do the research, and let the perception of what we do just take care of itself, but that’s a big mistake.

If we are going to survive as a sector and continue to move ahead, important efforts need to be made. First, we need to work harder to capture the hard data surrounding the value of our innovations, a very different concept than collecting data to set the simple price of a drug. The definition of cost effectiveness needs to take into account all the costs and all the benefits, including quality of life measurements, keeping our patients in the workforce and contributing to society, and keeping their families together. It’s difficult, but it can be done, as the data is available and transparent.

Second, we need to enlist as advocates the perfect soldiers – the patients who are receiving our drugs and are benefitting from them, and our workers who are toiling in the field and know the challenges better than anyone. No one conveys the benefit of biotechnology better than patients, but someone working in the field also has a great role in explaining the rigors of our processes, how hard we work, and how important the work is.

It’s clear that healthcare reform overall is coming, is welcome and is necessary. In order to ensure that the proper context for biotechnology is taken into consideration in these efforts, we’d better be vocal, persistent, and active in telling the story, and enlist others to help us tell the story. It’s a good story to tell.

Author: H. Stewart Parker

Stewart Parker is a biotech consultant and was previously the CEO of the Infectious Disease Research Institute in Seattle. Parker co-founded Seattle-based Targeted Genetics and worked there as president and CEO since it spun off from Immunex in 1992 until November 2008. She served in various capacities at Immunex from August 1981 through December 1991, most recently as vice president, corporate development. Ms. Parker also served as president and a director of Receptech Corporation, a company formed by Immunex in 1989 to accelerate the development of soluble cytokine receptor products, from February 1991 to January 1993. She serves on the board of directors and the executive committee of BIO, the primary trade organization for the biotechnology industry, and as a director of several companies and non-profit organizations. Ms. Parker received her B.A. and M.B.A. from the University of Washington.