Of Venture Socialism and the Future of VCs—The Story of Jo Tango and Kepha Partners

decided not to continue, three it took to a Series A round, and one that is still pending. The A round firms include: AutoVirt (automated data migration for Windows servers), Azuki Systems (software enabling video and other content delivery to mobile devices), and ByLedge (founded by relational database pioneer Michael Stonebraker, it is still in stealth mode, though Tango says it’s in the “search space”).

Tango believes in working very closely with companies as they get going, in starting small, and in not forcing an investment. Smart, experienced entrepreneurs don’t want to raise a lot money initially, he explains. “The end game is not to raise a big venture round, the end game is to build a big, sustainable business.” If VCs have written big checks early on, they and the entrepreneurs can become so entrenched in the business that they have a hard time accepting reality if it isn’t the right idea. “No one wants to walk away,” Tango says.

Case in point: Kepha’s first investment, Azuki. Co-founder and chairman Cheng Wu had started three other companies that together created billions in shareholder value—Arrowpoint, Arris, and Acopia. Wu and co-founder Raj Nair, the CTO, showed up with a couple slides and an idea. “I thought the idea was interesting,” Tango says. So the men moved into Kepha’s office, and joined Tango in putting up $5,000 to get things going and investigate further. A couple months later, Tango says, “we thought we had something.” So both he and Cheng wrote checks for a several-hundred-thousand-dollar seed round. That led to a $6 million Series A round led by Kepha and Sigma Partners that closed in September 2007. Azuki raised another $6.1 million from the same two firms and company management this May.

It was a similar story with Stonebraker. Tango had worked with the database expert at Highland. Stonebraker had a new idea, named Morpheus, that they developed at Kepha for nine months with minimal funding. At that point, says Tango, the men agreed that “it was interesting, but not compelling. So we said we’re going to stop working on it. Three months later, he [Stonebraker] had a new idea.”

That was ByLedge, which in July 2008 completed a Series A round (the amount is still undisclosed) with Kepha and Flybridge Capital Partners as co-funders.

Venture Socialism

Kepha Partners logoUntil Hjerpe joined last week, Tango was the only investor at Kepha Partners. He has actually been looking for an investment partner almost since Day One. “I’ve met with 70 people over three years,” Tango says. “We take our time in recruiting, because we’re looking for partners in the truest sense of the word. The fit has to be right.”

Which bring us to the venture socialism model. There are only four people at Kepha—Tango, Hjerpe, Ed Hamilton, the firm’s CFO, and Lyn Elfman, an executive assistant. Aside from Elfman, everyone is a partner. There are no managing partners, managing directors, VPs, junior partners, associates, etc. And while Tango won’t talk in detail about the firm’s economics, he says they are unusually egalitarian for a venture firm. “We’re venture capitalists, but we’re venture socialists.” he says. “I think it’s very fair to say that we share the wealth and the upside in our firm.”

I tried to learn more about what this model means—asking if all partners got the same salary, or what. Tango stuck to his guns about not revealing more, but he did say that “the Kepha vision is an equal partnership,” and that its “economics are as flat as possible.” It sounds like all partners get roughly the same compensation—but read into it what you will.

This flat partnership, though, ties into a last critical aspect of Kepha’s investment philosophy. Says Tango, “We firmly believe that, one, the entrepreneur is our customer. Two, we have to add value to our entrepreneurs and their companies. And thirdly, the best people to add value are people who have been in venture a long time.” He believes there is simply no replacing experience when it comes to helping an entrepreneur—from experience with different economic conditions and business models to a strong Rolodex. When he finds the right experienced partner, he is willing to share the wealth. “I firmly believe venture capital is best played as a team sport,” he says.

Venture 2.0

Tango isn’t saying venture socialism is the way of the future—but he does think that venture capitalism is undergoing a period of transformation and that small, focused firms like Kepha with somewhat untraditional models might be illustrative of one potential new path for the industry.

“I just get the feeling that VC 1.0 is over,” he says. “The industry is going through massive change, and we’re in this in-between period where the VC 2.0 period is going to start, but yet we don’t yet know what VC 2.0 is going to look like.”

Every industry goes through transformative periods, and venture capitalists of all people shouldn’t be surprised at this reality, he says. After all, they are funding startups that routinely go after the likes of IBM, Amazon, and Google with game-changing ideas. Says Tango, “It would be weird if all industries go through change, and the one industry that doesn’t change is the one industry that funds innovation.”

Author: Robert Buderi

Bob is Xconomy's founder and chairman. He is one of the country's foremost journalists covering business and technology. As a noted author and magazine editor, he is a sought-after commentator on innovation and global competitiveness. Before taking his most recent position as a research fellow in MIT's Center for International Studies, Bob served as Editor in Chief of MIT's Technology Review, then a 10-times-a-year publication with a circulation of 315,000. Bob led the magazine to numerous editorial and design awards and oversaw its expansion into three foreign editions, electronic newsletters, and highly successful conferences. As BusinessWeek's technology editor, he shared in the 1992 National Magazine Award for The Quality Imperative. Bob is the author of four books about technology and innovation. Naval Innovation for the 21st Century (2013) is a post-Cold War account of the Office of Naval Research. Guanxi (2006) focuses on Microsoft's Beijing research lab as a metaphor for global competitiveness. Engines of Tomorrow (2000) describes the evolution of corporate research. The Invention That Changed the World (1996) covered a secret lab at MIT during WWII. Bob served on the Council on Competitiveness-sponsored National Innovation Initiative and is an advisor to the Draper Prize Nominating Committee. He has been a regular guest of CNBC's Strategy Session and has spoken about innovation at many venues, including the Business Council, Amazon, eBay, Google, IBM, and Microsoft.