Celladon’s Gene Therapy Passes Heart Failure Trial; Maintains Suspense on Details

Celladon has some tantalizing news today for the world of gene therapy. The San Diego-based biotech company is announcing that its experimental treatment, which delivers a gene to help people with heart failure pump blood more efficiently, has met its primary goal of showing the treatment is more effective than a placebo.

The trial enrolled 39 patients with advanced heart failure who were randomly assigned to get a single-shot infusion of Celladon’s gene therapy, called Mydicar, or a placebo. The study, called Cupid, was designed to compare the drug to placebo on a mixture of important factors, like whether patients on the drug could get out of the hospital sooner, how often they need heart transplants or implants, how far they could walk for six minutes, and how long they lived. Patients were followed for as long as a year.

Celladon isn’t revealing any details in today’s announcement about how much better its treatment performed versus placebo, so it’s impossible to say with certainty how big a deal this is. But CEO Krisztina Zsebo said her company’s drug showed a statistically significant advantage over the placebo group on the study’s primary goal. And there was no greater rate of adverse events among patients who got the gene therapy than those in the placebo. Detailed results will be presented at European Society of Cardiology’s Heart Failure Congress in Berlin on May 30, and will be published soon in a top peer-reviewed journal, Zsebo says.

“We’re very excited. This has been a long, tough program, and a lot of translational science has gone into making it a success,” Zsebo says.

If the European cardiologists agree that this is an important finding, it will be a major milestone for gene therapy and for heart failure patients. Gene therapy was hyped in the early 1990s as a cure-all for diseases that resisted conventional drug treatment. The idea is to deliver properly functioning copies of genes into cells where they can replace missing or faulty genes at the root cause of certain diseases. The field was plagued by safety concerns in the late 1990s, and many companies abandoned the field altogether. Even today, no such treatment has yet won FDA approval.

Krisztina Zsebo
Krisztina Zsebo

But Celladon likes its chances for a few reasons: Older gene therapy techniques used common viruses as the delivery mode to get those genes inside cells, which often failed. Celladon sought out what it thought was a better delivery tool with adeno-associated virus technology from Seattle-based Targeted Genetics, which engineered the viruses so they would be efficient without causing illness. Congestive heart failure was thought to be an ideal testing ground for gene therapy, partly because it’s a serious illness that kills 300,000 people a year, who have few treatment options other than beta-blockers and diuretics. And Celladon’s therapy can be delivered via a direct infusion into the heart, and doesn’t need to circulate effectively through the body—a distribution challenge that has tripped up other gene therapies of the past.

The Celladon program began about five or six years ago, Zsebo says. The concept was to deliver a gene called SERCA2a into heart muscle cells. Once in the heart cells, it produces an enzyme that improves the heart’s ability to pump blood.

Everything is riding on the outcome of this trial for tiny Celladon, which

Author: Luke Timmerman

Luke is an award-winning journalist specializing in life sciences. He has served as national biotechnology editor for Xconomy and national biotechnology reporter for Bloomberg News. Luke got started covering life sciences at The Seattle Times, where he was the lead reporter on an investigation of doctors who leaked confidential information about clinical trials to investors. The story won the Scripps Howard National Journalism Award and several other national prizes. Luke holds a bachelor’s degree in journalism from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and during the 2005-2006 academic year, he was a Knight Science Journalism Fellow at MIT.