A Consensus of Three: Venture Capital Still Looking to Grab Rebound

Have we turned the corner on the recession? That was the big question for the out-of-town venture capital partners—including two from the San Francisco Bay Area—who came to San Diego last week to offer their perspective on the post-collapse generation of venture capital and technology innovation.

“One thing that’s clear is that the other side of that corner is not going to be the same,” said Emily Mendell, vice president of strategic affairs with the National Venture Capital Association in Washington, DC. Mendell also came to town to moderate the breakfast discussion organized by the San Diego Venture Group, also featured Bryan Roberts, a Venrock partner in San Francisco; David Dreesen, a Battery Ventures partner in Menlo Park, CA; and Mike Dodd, a venture partner at Austin Ventures in Austin, TX.

So what did these VCs say about a rebound? Dreesen and Dodd said “yes” when they thought the question was whether the overall economy had turned the corner. But all three VCs said “no” when Mendell clarified her question to ask whether the venture capital industry itself is rebounding.

“The Valley [Silicon Valley] is red-hot for early stage deals,” said Dodd, who oversees mostly Web-enabled consumer and online media deals at Austin Ventures. VC investing also has developed some interesting themes in certain sectors, such as Internet startups, which have become much cheaper to develop and much easier to bootstrap. But the fundamental problems remain: There is still little exit activity among venture-funded startups, “and just too much money running around,” Dodd said.

Cleantech also has been a robust sector for VC investing, accounting for over 30 percent—or about $1.7 billion—of the venture capital that was invested nationwide during the first quarter, according to Dreesen, who oversees much of Battery Ventures’ cleantech deals. But Dreesen added, “There really hasn’t been a shakeout in cleantech,” where he estimates $30 billion has been invested since 2005.

So does he see a bubble in cleantech?

“Well, when you’ve got $30 billion going in, you’d like to see at least $30 billion coming out,” Dreesen said. He estimated an investment like that would have to generate something like $120 billion in total return on investments to justify the risks, which seems unlikely. “I think cleantech as a sector is not going to do well,” Dreesen said, “although we think there are opportunities that are going to do well.”

Roberts, who oversees investments in life sciences and health IT at Venrock, said the

Author: Bruce V. Bigelow

In Memoriam: Our dear friend Bruce V. Bigelow passed away on June 29, 2018. He was the editor of Xconomy San Diego from 2008 to 2018. Read more about his life and work here. Bruce Bigelow joined Xconomy from the business desk of the San Diego Union-Tribune. He was a member of the team of reporters who were awarded the 2006 Pulitzer Prize in National Reporting for uncovering bribes paid to San Diego Republican Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham in exchange for special legislation earmarks. He also shared a 2006 award for enterprise reporting from the Society of Business Editors and Writers for “In Harm’s Way,” an article about the extraordinary casualty rate among employees working in Iraq for San Diego’s Titan Corp. He has written extensively about the 2002 corporate accounting scandal at software goliath Peregrine Systems. He also was a Gerald Loeb Award finalist and National Headline Award winner for “The Toymaker,” a 14-part chronicle of a San Diego start-up company. He takes special satisfaction, though, that the series was included in the library for nonfiction narrative journalism at the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. Bigelow graduated from U.C. Berkeley in 1977 with a degree in English Literature and from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism in 1979. Before joining the Union-Tribune in 1990, he worked for the Associated Press in Los Angeles and The Kansas City Times.