Latest in Stroke-Prevention Saga: FDA Panel Backs Drug From J&J and Bayer

the risk they’ll suffer strokes. Warfarin lessens that risk by at least two-thirds, says Christopher Granger, a professor of medicine at Duke Clinical Research Institute. “But patients need to be monitored on a regular basis because of the unpredictable nature of warfarin’s effects,” he says. “It interacts with other drugs and food in a way that impacts lifestyle.” And it can cause dangerous and potentially fatal bleeding.

The battle to make warfarin obsolete is most definitely a New York story. Pfizer and Bristol, who teamed up to develop apixaban in 2007, are based in Manhattan. J&J’s sprawling headquarters building is located in nearby New Brunswick, NJ. Even Bayer, which is based in Germany, has a major New York presence—its consumer-products, diabetes, and pharmaceutical units all have offices in the area.

Rivaroxaban is not quite a guaranteed win for J&J and Bayer. Some analysts are predicting the label for the drug may include some restrictions on its marketing. And as yesterday’s enlightening blow-by-blow of the panel discussion by a Forbes blogger shows, the panelists were less-than-enthusiastic about the drug, even as they were voting in favor of approval. “I don’t think anyone has supported a superiority claim” for rivaroxaban over warfarin, the reporter wrote just minutes before the panel discussion ended.

In a statement released after the vote, Peter DiBattiste, global therapeutic area head for J&J’s cardiovascular and metabolism unit, said: “We are pleased with the committee’s recommendation and look forward to working with the FDA to help make this important therapy available in the U.S.”

The J&J/Bayer and Bristol/Pfizer teams won’t just be duking it out against each other and the mainstay warfarin. They’ll also be fighting for market share against dabigatran (Pradaxa), an anti-clotting drug from Boehringer Ingelheim that targets a different protein in the clotting cascade. And Japan’s Daiichi Sankyo is developing its own Factor Xa inhibitor, edoxaban. They’re all grabbing for a piece of a market that could be enormous: Leerink Swann analyst Seamus Fernandez estimates the total market size to be between $3 billion and $5 billion.

Granger has done studies on both apixaban and dabigatran. But he’s hoping all four competitors ultimately make it to the market. “It could only be a good thing for patient care to have more than one option,” he says. “They all have benefits over warfarin.”

Author: Arlene Weintraub

Arlene is an award-winning journalist specializing in life sciences and technology. She was previously a senior health writer based out of the New York City headquarters of BusinessWeek, where she wrote hundreds of articles that explored both the science and business of health. Her freelance pieces have been published in USA Today, US News & World Report, Technology Review, and other media outlets. Arlene has won awards from the New York Press Club, the Association of Health Care Journalists, the Foundation for Biomedical Research, and the American Society of Business Publication Editors. Her book about the anti-aging industry, Selling the Fountain of Youth, was published by Basic Books in September 2010.