Genentech Looks to Turn the Page at Breast Cancer Confab

Genentech was at the center of controversy over the past year in the breast cancer world because of an argument about one of its top-selling antibody drugs. But now the biotech giant is hoping that a new antibody in the pipeline will get people talking again about clear-cut medical progress.

The South San Francisco-based unit of Roche is getting ready in the next week to unveil pivotal clinical trial results for pertuzumab at one of the big annual meetings in breast cancer therapy—the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

The feature presentation on pertuzumab, from a study of 808 patients, will show how much longer the new drug can keep the disease from worsening in patients getting their first round of treatment for breast cancer that has spread, and that overexpresses the HER2 protein. Genentech has long dominated the field of HER2 amplified breast cancer, with its blockbuster antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin). But by combining pertuzumab with the old standby, and also by pushing forward with a souped-up version of the original, the bet is that Genentech can fend off competitors like GlaxoSmithKline’s lapatinib (Tykerb) for the long haul and raise the bar again in patient care.

If these drugs can go on to win FDA approval, it could also help mute some of the controversy over use of bevacizumab (Avastin) in breast cancer patients who don’t overexpress the HER2 protein. Genentech had fought to retain FDA clearance of the drug for that condition, but FDA revoked the approval last month after it said new clinical evidence showed the benefits no longer outweigh the risks.

Genentech is probably still smarting from this loss, estimated at $873 million in revenue, but to use a football analogy here, you could say the best defense is a good offense with pertuzumab.

“This is going to be a really exciting San Antonio meeting for us and for pertuzumab in particular,” says Sandra Horning, Genentech’s senior vice president, and global head of clinical development for hematology/oncology. “Pertuzumab is going to represent a major advance in treating HER2 positive breast cancer.”

Anticipation for pertuzumab has been building for a while. The drug is designed to bind to a different place on the HER2 molecule than trastuzumab, which Genentech scientists have long theorized might create a more complete blockade of that tumor-signaling pathway. Evidence emerged last year to support this idea, at the same San Antonio conference. At that conference, researchers reported on a study of 417 patients, called Neosphere, in which tumors completely disappeared in 45.8 percent of women who got both antibodies along with chemo prior to surgery, compared with 29 percent who did that well on just the standard trastuzumab and chemo alone. There wasn’t a significant difference in side effects between the two treatment groups.

Still, as with any cancer drug, there were significant side effects to report. About 45 percent of patients in the Neosphere study experienced a moderate to severe depletion of their infection-fighting white blood cells (neutropenia), while 8.4 percent had a fever associated with low white blood cell counts (febrile neutropenia). Another 5.6 percent of patients reported moderate to severe diarrhea. But researchers said they didn’t see a significant increase in cardiac side effects. That’s important because heart risks are known to be associated in rare cases with use of Herceptin.

This year in San Antonio, researchers will get

Author: Luke Timmerman

Luke is an award-winning journalist specializing in life sciences. He has served as national biotechnology editor for Xconomy and national biotechnology reporter for Bloomberg News. Luke got started covering life sciences at The Seattle Times, where he was the lead reporter on an investigation of doctors who leaked confidential information about clinical trials to investors. The story won the Scripps Howard National Journalism Award and several other national prizes. Luke holds a bachelor’s degree in journalism from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and during the 2005-2006 academic year, he was a Knight Science Journalism Fellow at MIT.