Demandware and the Future of Retail: A Post-IPO Snapshot

have an open technology platform, so retail businesses can do things like set their own promotions and price delineations and port over their own data and applications. It’s also important, he says, to give retailers control over the look and feel of their e-commerce sites and interfaces and, of course, to make sure they don’t crash.

As for staying innovative, Garf points to the company’s Labs group, which lets developers work on projects outside the product management process. (Every tech company, once it gets big enough, seems to have something like this; how well it works is another question.)

“That team is incented on identifying and executing the next cool and big thing,” he says. “They don’t have to put together a formal business case.” One example from Labs: a social button for Pinterest, the online pin board, that integrates with Demandware’s platform so a customer like Brooks Sports can add the button to its product pages (for social sharing).

Beyond such upgrades, however, Demandware is looking to become the “digital backbone across all devices” for luxury brands, Garf says. “The perception in the marketplace is that we’re a strong player to support medium-size retailers for direct-to-consumer operations.” But increasingly, he says, brands like Pier1, Brooks Brothers, Marks & Spencer, and Lands’ End are using Demandware’s software to handle a broader range of commerce needs and to expand globally. “The mold has been broken,” he says.

The company will certainly face plenty of competition in that arena. Yet Garf sees some relevant lessons from the experiences of e-commerce big boys Amazon and eBay. “They are less about retailing, and more about being the digital intermediary,” he says.

In other words, if Demandware can position itself as the go-to tech provider for many more brands to sell stuff digitally, it should do OK. Garf notes that in the retail industry these days, there are two main categories—commodity and luxury—and you don’t want to get stuck in the middle, as either a retailer or a technology provider.

“We tend to serve the fashion and luxury segment, who’s really focused on brand differentiating,” he says. “Whereas Amazon is focused on the commodity business. They’ve already won that market. We’re targeting a different market.”

Author: Gregory T. Huang

Greg is a veteran journalist who has covered a wide range of science, technology, and business. As former editor in chief, he overaw daily news, features, and events across Xconomy's national network. Before joining Xconomy, he was a features editor at New Scientist magazine, where he edited and wrote articles on physics, technology, and neuroscience. Previously he was senior writer at Technology Review, where he reported on emerging technologies, R&D, and advances in computing, robotics, and applied physics. His writing has also appeared in Wired, Nature, and The Atlantic Monthly’s website. He was named a New York Times professional fellow in 2003. Greg is the co-author of Guanxi (Simon & Schuster, 2006), about Microsoft in China and the global competition for talent and technology. Before becoming a journalist, he did research at MIT’s Artificial Intelligence Lab. He has published 20 papers in scientific journals and conferences and spoken on innovation at Adobe, Amazon, eBay, Google, HP, Microsoft, Yahoo, and other organizations. He has a Master’s and Ph.D. in electrical engineering and computer science from MIT, and a B.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.