Xconomist of the Week: John Reed on Sanford-Burnham’s Drug Pipeline

Johnson & Johnson’s discovery operation in the United States for a number of years. He had about 700 people reporting to him and put almost 60 NMEs [new molecular entities] in their pipeline.

We decided to build a highly collaborative model where we built teams around projects that would have biologists and chemists, structural biologists, bioinformaticists, and engineers. So we’d get these big multi-disciplinary teams focused around projects. So it was really team-based science, collaborative science. And we did a lot of things culturally to make collaboration sort of the mantra of the organization, from our mission statement on down.

It really did and does work. The citation impact is one indicator that it does work. It’s not because our scientists are any smarter than anybody else’s. I often point out that we’ve only had one National Academy of Sciences member out of our 89 faculty members. In fact, I’m a little miffed because of the politics around it. So it’s not like I’ve got 50 National Academy members to explain why we’re No. 1 in citation impact in the world. It’s because we work well as a team.

We also have been the only organization to have rising NIH grant revenues at a time when budgets were flat or declining. We’ve had eight consecutive years of double digit growth in our NIH grant base. We’ve become the third most-highly funded of the laboratory-based nonprofit research institutes in the country, we do about $90 million in NIH grants and $110 million overall. We weren’t even in the top 10 when we started.

It’s unusual for an organization of this size to have nine products in clinical development. We have a pipeline of 16 small molecule drug development projects that are moving toward the clinic. And we have at least 15 protein drug projects that are through initial animal model “proof of concept” testing and undergoing further optimization. So the pipeline we’ve created of additional therapeutic opportunities, just in the last decade, sort of speaks for itself.

X: So how does that handoff occur, as you move from R&D to commercialization?

JR: We’ve had several models, they include pharma partnering, which can be either a project at a time and they’ll come in and license it. Or we may collaborate for a couple of years before

Author: Bruce V. Bigelow

In Memoriam: Our dear friend Bruce V. Bigelow passed away on June 29, 2018. He was the editor of Xconomy San Diego from 2008 to 2018. Read more about his life and work here. Bruce Bigelow joined Xconomy from the business desk of the San Diego Union-Tribune. He was a member of the team of reporters who were awarded the 2006 Pulitzer Prize in National Reporting for uncovering bribes paid to San Diego Republican Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham in exchange for special legislation earmarks. He also shared a 2006 award for enterprise reporting from the Society of Business Editors and Writers for “In Harm’s Way,” an article about the extraordinary casualty rate among employees working in Iraq for San Diego’s Titan Corp. He has written extensively about the 2002 corporate accounting scandal at software goliath Peregrine Systems. He also was a Gerald Loeb Award finalist and National Headline Award winner for “The Toymaker,” a 14-part chronicle of a San Diego start-up company. He takes special satisfaction, though, that the series was included in the library for nonfiction narrative journalism at the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. Bigelow graduated from U.C. Berkeley in 1977 with a degree in English Literature and from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism in 1979. Before joining the Union-Tribune in 1990, he worked for the Associated Press in Los Angeles and The Kansas City Times.