Zillions of Biotech Conferences Want You. Which Should You Attend?

in April, and I was overloaded with events I was running for Xconomy in two cities that month. Two, the meeting was held in Chicago, where we don’t have a bureau. Three, I don’t like going to conferences where I get pitched lots of story ideas that make no sense for my publication, so I have to beat away the PR people with a stick. (Reporters: I know you feel my pain.) BIO, to me, is a great conference for people getting started in the industry, because there are so many educational sessions. There are certainly lots of Big Pharma business development people there, so I’m sure it’s worthwhile for many biotech dealmakers. But there are not enough innovators, and too many vendors, for my taste.

Sage Commons Congress. I attended this quirky conference in April in San Francisco for a few reasons. It’s loaded with the most diverse cast of intellectual, creative people you’ll find anywhere in the biotech and pharma business. I’ve spent the last few years covering former Merck executive Stephen Friend and this daring quest to spark an open source movement in biology. I’m curious to see where this nonprofit will ultimately go, and I knew I’d be one of the few media people there to cover it. This year was the final Sage Commons Congress, as the group needs to take its game to the next level by engaging researchers and patients online.

Calbio 2013. This conference is coming up next month in San Diego, and is co-hosted by BayBio, the San Francisco area biotech trade group, and Biocom, which represents companies in the San Diego area. I expect quite a few newsmakers to be there, and it’s close to home for me on the West Coast. Unfortunately, I can’t make it this year because I’ll be on vacation. Maybe next year.

BioPharm America. This conference is held in September in Boston. I’ve never attended this one, but it attracts a lot of the biotech executives in Boston that I want to stay in touch with, and also ropes in a bunch of pharma people from Europe that I want to get to know better. Plus, I need to travel to Boston at least twice a year to stay up on the biotech companies there, and September seems like a good time after everyone’s back from summer vacations.

Partnering for Cures. I’ve never been to this event organized by the nonprofit FasterCures, but it strikes me as the biggest gathering of patient advocacy groups, biotech companies, pharma companies, and regulators. Patient advocacy groups are rising in influence in drug development, as they are gaining money and development savvy. I feel the need to get to know this reader group better, so I’ll plan to be there in New York in November.

Advances in Genome Biology and Technology. This is the top technical meeting for whiz-bang genomics tools. It’s held every February at a remote place called Marco Island along the Florida Gulf Coast, where all the scientists kick back for a few days. I’ve missed out on a few big scoops the past couple years by missing this meeting, but I don’t think I can justify attending. To me, AGBT is why we have Twitter. It makes it so journalists like me can do the laundry at home on Saturday morning, while occasionally glancing at the phone to see if any news is breaking in real-time, 3,000 miles away. If so, I can always fire up the laptop and write something.

Personalized Medicine Conference. This conference is held in November at Harvard Medical School. I attended this one in 2011, and found it to be a good networking opportunity with scientists and businesspeople doing a lot of innovative things. There was also plenty of preaching to the choir, and not much debate about a subject screaming out for debate.

Personalized Medicine World Conference. Here’s yet another personalized medicine conference, except with shorter, focused talks featuring lots of entrepreneurs from in and around Silicon Valley. I went for the first time this year in January, partly because I’m interested, partly because it wasn’t scheduled too close to the JP Morgan marathon, and partly because the organizers asked me to be part of it. This event is good for networking, but the short talks make it hard to gain much understanding about what people are really doing.

American Society of Hematology. This event, held every December, is my favorite underdog medical meeting, even though I haven’t attended in a few years. Lots of real news breaks every year in the world of leukemia/lymphoma treatments, and there traditionally haven’t been many reporters there to chronicle it. Nothing like the scrum you see at ASCO. One other good cancer meeting that allows time for learning, and less frenzied scrambling and vendor hucksterism, is the American Association for Cancer Research.

BIO Investor Forum. This has been a decent little event for me in years’ past, because it’s small, and provides a quiet opportunity to network with a bunch of biotech CEOs at private and public companies. There aren’t many competing media, it’s at a grand old hotel in San Francisco, and the weather is usually great in mid-October.

Are there any other meetings out there that you consider to be must-attends? I’ve left out a lot of specialized scientific and medical meetings for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, antibiotics, infectious diseases, obesity, multiple sclerosis, ophthalmology, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, various rare diseases, and more, largely because I figure that they tend to generate one-off stories that are best covered from the office. But I’d love to hear from biotech readers which meetings make sense for you to attend and why. Be sure to leave a comment below, or send me a note at ltimmerman [at] xconomy.com.

Author: Luke Timmerman

Luke is an award-winning journalist specializing in life sciences. He has served as national biotechnology editor for Xconomy and national biotechnology reporter for Bloomberg News. Luke got started covering life sciences at The Seattle Times, where he was the lead reporter on an investigation of doctors who leaked confidential information about clinical trials to investors. The story won the Scripps Howard National Journalism Award and several other national prizes. Luke holds a bachelor’s degree in journalism from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and during the 2005-2006 academic year, he was a Knight Science Journalism Fellow at MIT.