Apple’s iPad Melts Into Thin Air (in a Good Way)

iPad Air

Apple sent review units of its new iPad Air tablet to select journalists earlier this week. I was not one of them, perhaps because of stories like this one. But I was near the front of the line at the Apple Store in downtown San Francisco at 5:00 this morning, eager to plunk down my plastic for the new new iPad, which has the same 9.7-inch screen as its predecessors but has been described as more slender, lithe, and capable in every other way.

After spending a few hours with the device, I’m in agreement with those reports, and thrilled with my purchase. This is the device the iPad was always meant to be.

Previous generations of Apple tablets boasted big, beautiful touchscreens, but were a little too heavy to hold comfortably for extended periods (as you do if you’re reading a book or magazine). The iPad Air is light. All of the reviewers have said this, of course, but it’s worth repeating. The 181 grams that Apple has shaved off, compared to the third- and fourth-generation devices, makes all the difference.

My old third-generation iPad, at 650 grams (1.43 lbs), feels like a brick. The Air, at 469 grams (1.03 lbs), feels more like a book. Actually, it’s quite a bit lighter than most hardcover books. Holding my old iPad in my hand for more than a few minutes gave me an aching wrist and a sore pinkie. I can already tell that the Air is going to be much gentler on both body parts.

Here’s the other big thing that jumps out at me about the Air: the sound from the internal speakers is vastly better. For the first time in an Apple tablet, the iPad Air has a pair of speakers, which means you finally get stereo. Even though the speakers are close together on one side of the device, the difference in sound quality is obvious and dramatic.

The Air’s performance is zippy so far, exhibiting none of the awkward pauses and stutters that I started to notice after upgrading my third-generation iPad to iOS 7. This latest iteration of Apple’s mobile operating system came with graphical features, like layers, blur, transparency, and parallax, that put a big strain on the processor. The A7 chip inside the iPad Air (the same one that’s inside the new iPhone 5S and 5C) is up to the task, while the the A5X inside my third-generation iPad clearly struggles.

The iPad Air has the same 5-megapixel camera as my third-generation iPad, but it has a 3.3-mm lens that gives it a slightly wider field of view. The front-facing camera is where the real imaging improvements have been made. It’s a 1.2-megapixel sensor, compared to a grainy 0.3 megapixels on the third-generation iPad. So self-portraits and video calls will come across much more sharply.

I haven’t had time to check out how individual applications perform on the iPad Air. My expectation is that they’ll all run faster.

But that’s not why I wanted the newest iPad enough to get up early to buy one today. I wanted one because it was clear last year, when Apple came out with the first-generation iPad mini, that the company had achieved a breakthrough in slim, lightweight design. The mini was fantastically easy to hold. Unfortunately, it had key drawbacks that kept me from falling in love with it—its screen felt too small, and it lacked sufficient resolution for reading. (By that time I’d gotten accustomed to the 2,048-by-1,536-pixel Retina screen on my third-generation iPad). But I knew it was only a matter of time before Apple figured out how to put a Retina screen into the mini (which they’re doing, in an edition expected to appear later this month) and apply the same design innovations to the full-size iPad.

The iPad Air a worthy upgrade, even if you’ve already got a third- or fourth-generation iPad. And if you’ve never owned a tablet, it’s a great place to start. Sometimes, less is just less. But this time, it’s more.

Author: Wade Roush

Between 2007 and 2014, I was a staff editor for Xconomy in Boston and San Francisco. Since 2008 I've been writing a weekly opinion/review column called VOX: The Voice of Xperience. (From 2008 to 2013 the column was known as World Wide Wade.) I've been writing about science and technology professionally since 1994. Before joining Xconomy in 2007, I was a staff member at MIT’s Technology Review from 2001 to 2006, serving as senior editor, San Francisco bureau chief, and executive editor of TechnologyReview.com. Before that, I was the Boston bureau reporter for Science, managing editor of supercomputing publications at NASA Ames Research Center, and Web editor at e-book pioneer NuvoMedia. I have a B.A. in the history of science from Harvard College and a PhD in the history and social study of science and technology from MIT. I've published articles in Science, Technology Review, IEEE Spectrum, Encyclopaedia Brittanica, Technology and Culture, Alaska Airlines Magazine, and World Business, and I've been a guest of NPR, CNN, CNBC, NECN, WGBH and the PBS NewsHour. I'm a frequent conference participant and enjoy opportunities to moderate panel discussions and on-stage chats. My personal site: waderoush.com My social media coordinates: Twitter: @wroush Facebook: facebook.com/wade.roush LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/waderoush Google+ : google.com/+WadeRoush YouTube: youtube.com/wroush1967 Flickr: flickr.com/photos/wroush/ Pinterest: pinterest.com/waderoush/