Funding Options Shrink for Early-Stage Cleantech Ventures

to Monsanto’s $1.1 billion acquisition of Climate Corp., which analyzes weather data to create crop insurance. But there are also a number of companies using sensors and drones to improve farming and there are a number of biotech veterans who see natural overlap. “Agriculture is getting a lot of attention from investors who say it looks a lot like biotech and they are kind of making the jump,” Ault says.

But early-stage startups are getting less funding.

One worrying trend for entrepreneurs is that the number of deals going into seed or Series A funding rounds has dropped from last year. This means that companies need to work harder to get early-stage funding, a consequence of over exuberance in years past. “It’s not just deal volume. Series A rounds are smaller than they used to be,” Ault says. “That’s the nature of any bubble or bubble-like scenario where you’ve got investors rushing in, copy-catting, and a lot of companies getting funding that shouldn’t have.”

Credit: Cleantech Group
Credit: Cleantech Group

Another area of concern is that there aren’t obvious sources of funding for companies trying to create radically better energy technologies, which many consider necessary to address climate change. Transatomic Power, an atomic energy startup that wants to generate electricity from spent nuclear fuel, today said it raised $2 million from FF Science, a portion of the Founders Fund dedicated to science- and engineering-based companies. But as a whole, venture companies are wary of any technology that could take close to a decade and hundreds of millions of dollars to commercialize. These are not the kinds of long-term investments most venture capital funds are set up to make.

Anecdotally, entrepreneurs will tell you that they struggle to get financing in the current environment or they need to be more creative in finding new sources of funding. One former battery startup CEO told me he’s moved out of energy because of the  funding environment. Venture capitalists say it’s difficult to form syndicates since many firms have exited cleantech, which means they sometimes need to dedicate their available money to their existing startups, rather than funding new ones.

But despite the challenging funding situation for some types of companies, few would question that energy and natural resources are areas ripe for innovation, given the stresses caused by a growing global population and a changing climate. The question for entrepreneurs is whether they can find the financial backers to realize their clever ideas.

Author: Martin LaMonica

Martin is a veteran journalist covering science, technology, and business from Cambridge, MA. He writes about energy and technology for Xconomy, MIT Technology Review, the Boston Globe, the Guardian, Scientific American, IEEE Spectrum, and others. For ten years, he was senior editor at CNET where he covered clean tech, the Web, and tech companies. During the dotcom boom and bust, he was executive editor at enterprise IT publication InfoWorld and previously was the Paris correspondent for the IDG News Service. He graduated from Cornell University.