Can Innovation Save Us?

During a summer that’s been marred by political upheaval and horrific violence inside and outside the U.S., it’s natural for startup entrepreneurs and others immersed in the technology world—including us journalists—to wonder about the role of innovation in solving social problems.

In the wake of the murder of five police officers in Dallas, which followed so closely on the heels of the videotaped police shootings in Minnesota and Louisiana, which themselves followed so closely on the heels of the nightclub massacre in Orlando, there’s a sense that social tensions in the United States have reached a peak not seen since the late 1960s. The violence, and nonstop Internet media coverage, is ripping away whatever bandages still covered the wounds from centuries of racism and other isms.

Politicians can’t seem to quell the discontent. In fact, some of them are deliberately inflaming it. The middle ground, if there is any in U.S. politics, has long since been scorched. We all seem to live at the extremes of a polarized society.

Abroad, there’s only more chaos. Simmering resentment toward authority, elitism, and institutions has boiled over in Great Britain and threatens to destabilize the entire European Union. The terrorist attacks in Paris, Brussels, Istanbul, Dhaka, and so many other places testify to the unchecked, virus-like spread of ISIS-inspired jihadism, which is itself a product of social breakdown in the Middle East.

If your own livelihood depends in some way on entrepreneurship or innovation, chances are that you’re an optimist, at least about the big picture. You can’t help thinking that there must be some set of technologies, or some method of thinking, that could be adapted from the fecund world of technology and startups to heal and support societies as they find a way back to a semblance of peace and (hopefully more equitable) prosperity.

Is it really true?

In the short term, no.

In the long term, yes.

More body cameras might deter police when they’re tempted to use excessive force—or support an officer’s side of the story—but they won’t cure systemic racism, in which law enforcement organizations are merely a participant, not a first cause.

More smartphones, more social media, and more viral video will help to expose police brutality when it happens. This might stoke enough outrage to prompt real change in the way cities and states monitor law enforcement and begin to reverse the conditions that lead urban citizens, especially African-Americans, to fear and revile their own police forces. But in the short term, videos and social media can also foment even more violence, as we saw in Dallas.

Better edtech, perhaps in the form of next-generation MOOCs and other online training, might help people beset by the skills gap enter the high-tech workforce, which might help to slow rising inequality. But building effective courseware and delivering it to the right people will take time.

The same goes for better, more accessible healthcare. This is another important antidote to inequality for populations beset by disability, mental illness, or addiction. But even the modest gains in access achieved under the Obama administration will be under threat if Republicans get a chance to roll back healthcare reform.

The Internet, in all its permutations and with all its new modes of delivery on phones and wrists and televisions, will likely come to be seen as the single biggest step our species has taken toward current-events literacy and participatory democracy. But in the short term, it gives everyone access to their own set of facts, and supplies filters that allow us to retreat into exclusive virtual communities of like-minded people, stoking a sense of “us versus them.”

In short, technology can’t cure racism. It can’t bring out comity and understanding. It can help grow the economic pie, but it can’t, by itself, slice up the pie more equitably. For all of those things, we’ll need to find new leaders, ask them (and ourselves) tough questions, and locate new inner supplies of trust and honesty—along with the patience and civility to listen to one another. (Hint: more face to face, less screen time.)

All that said, there are plenty of tech companies and entrepreneurs out there who are working in small, gradual ways to nudge marketplaces, and the people in them, in socially responsible directions. The work these organizations are doing

Author: Wade Roush

Between 2007 and 2014, I was a staff editor for Xconomy in Boston and San Francisco. Since 2008 I've been writing a weekly opinion/review column called VOX: The Voice of Xperience. (From 2008 to 2013 the column was known as World Wide Wade.) I've been writing about science and technology professionally since 1994. Before joining Xconomy in 2007, I was a staff member at MIT’s Technology Review from 2001 to 2006, serving as senior editor, San Francisco bureau chief, and executive editor of TechnologyReview.com. Before that, I was the Boston bureau reporter for Science, managing editor of supercomputing publications at NASA Ames Research Center, and Web editor at e-book pioneer NuvoMedia. I have a B.A. in the history of science from Harvard College and a PhD in the history and social study of science and technology from MIT. I've published articles in Science, Technology Review, IEEE Spectrum, Encyclopaedia Brittanica, Technology and Culture, Alaska Airlines Magazine, and World Business, and I've been a guest of NPR, CNN, CNBC, NECN, WGBH and the PBS NewsHour. I'm a frequent conference participant and enjoy opportunities to moderate panel discussions and on-stage chats. My personal site: waderoush.com My social media coordinates: Twitter: @wroush Facebook: facebook.com/wade.roush LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/waderoush Google+ : google.com/+WadeRoush YouTube: youtube.com/wroush1967 Flickr: flickr.com/photos/wroush/ Pinterest: pinterest.com/waderoush/