Between a Rock and a Hard Place—JP Morgan Afterthoughts

Yes, the mood has undoubtedly improved in comparison to last year’s gathering of the healthcare investment community around the “old clock” at Union Square in San Francisco. But given the overall depression of last year this was perhaps not all that difficult to achieve. I have mulled over all the conversations I had during the usual four day frenzy, trying to sort out reality from wishful thinking, and here are a few admittedly subjective conclusions:

—The industry is still facing fundamental problems and has not convincingly formulated breakthrough solutions when it comes to the exorbitant cost of drug development, high attrition in the clinic, predictable FDA decision-making, reimbursement, and disruptive innovation. Everybody has been forced to implement draconian cost-cutting measures and it is amazing to see how much can still be done with so much less resources and money. But, we are really stretching resources and dollars towards the breaking point.

—Skepticism around IPOs in the healthcare sector without solid near-term revenue streams remains very high. Very few VC investors expect a significant increase of IPOs in 2011, hence, this favorite exit route of the biotech boom years remains elusive, putting continued emphasis on M&A.

—The emerging mantra of last year’s conversation about pharma and biotech (as well as their investors) being all in one boat has taken root. The dialogue centers around collaboration and partnership, risk-sharing, and early-stage engagement. This trend provides important feedback to biotech and biopharma startups which hopefully translates into improved relevance of the work done and financed in the early stage.

—Creativity around biotech-pharma deals has definitely increased and no structure is off the table. Buzzwords around Union Square were “option deals with negotiated upside” and “structured acquisitions.” The trend clearly points towards earlier collaboration and cost-sharing, albeit with fairly modest technology access fees or upfront payments. As a consequence, investors see their exit options dragged out more and more; simple all-cash acquisitions remain rare and might only be achieved in competitive situations created by high strategic value of assets.

—The discussion continues around the strategies of bringing innovation into healthcare. The recent mergers in pharma—Merck and Schering-Plough, Pfizer and Wyeth—have resulted in

Author: Jens Eckstein

Jens Eckstein joined TVM Capital in 2004 and is a general partner in the firm’s life sciences practice, where he focuses on earlier-stage investments. He is a member of the Board of Directors of CoNCERT Pharmaceuticals, Magen Biosciences, and Ascent Therapeutics, and served as an Advisor to Sirtris Pharmaceuticals. As director, Lead Discovery and Research IT, at Enanta Pharmaceuticals, he directed the company's lead discovery and knowledge management programs for novel therapeutics in hepatitis, asthma, psoriasis, and other autoimmune disorders. Prior to joining Enanta, Dr. Eckstein managed research groups in biochemistry, structural biology, and computational chemistry at Mitotix (now GPC-Biotech). Dr. Eckstein earned his doctorate, summa cum laude, in biological chemistry at the University of Konstanz and Harvard University. He was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of California in San Francisco and is an alumnus of the Kauffman Fellows Program. The author of more than 20 scientific publications, Dr. Eckstein also holds several issued and pending patents. He is managing editor of Frontiers in Bioscience “Current Topics in Lead Discovery” and serves as an editorial board advisor for IDrugs. Dr. Eckstein is also an Advisor to the Alzheimer Research Forum (ARF) and a founding member of the Cure Dystonia Initiative Advisory Council (CDIAC).