IRobot Wins $286 Million Army Contract, Replacing Contract Previously Awarded to Robotic FX

In a dramatic turnaround that is sure to send holiday cheer echoing through its halls, Burlington, MA-based iRobot (NASDAQ: [[ticker:IRBT]]) has won a multi-million-dollar contract to deliver bomb detection robots to U.S. troops; the contract was originally awarded to arch-rival Robotic FX barely two months ago. The company said in an announcement released this morning that its bid of $286 million has now replaced Robotic FX’s initially successful $279.9 million bid.

Today’s announcement—although not unexpected, as news came out over the weekend that Robotic FX’s contract had been canceled—still marks a huge step in iRobot’s struggles against its Illinois-based rival. The original contract—allowing the Army to order up to 3,000 bomb detection robots for troops in the Middle East over the next five years, and including spare parts, training, and repair services—was awarded on September 14, after Robotic FX beat out iRobot in the bidding process. The two companies had both met the military’s technical requirements. But already by that time, iRobot had brought legal action against its competitor, which is run by a former iRobot employee, Jameel Ahed. IRobot contends in two lawsuits filed in August—one in U.S. District Court in Alabama and one now in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts—that the Negotiator robot built by Robotic FX is a knock-off of its own PackBot.

On October 23, presumably at least partially in light of information from the lawsuits, including the revelation that Ahed had destroyed some evidence in the case, Army contracts officer Joanne Byrd revealed her decision to set aside Robotic FX’s contract. In a letter to the Army’s Legal Services Agency, she outlined a series of steps that might then ensue. In the end, if Robotic FX was not found to be a “responsible” government contractor, Byrd said she would “award a contract to the next lowest bidder, iRobot.”

And now, that’s what seems to have happened.

We’ll post soon with more details. In the meantime, here’s the full archive of our coverage of the case, which has all the drama of high-stakes industrial espionage, complete with dumpster diving private detectives and attempts to hide evidence from U.S. Marshals.

Of course, the case is not over. The two parties are due back in Massachusetts court in January, and of course we plan to stay on top of the action.

Author: Robert Buderi

Bob is Xconomy's founder and chairman. He is one of the country's foremost journalists covering business and technology. As a noted author and magazine editor, he is a sought-after commentator on innovation and global competitiveness. Before taking his most recent position as a research fellow in MIT's Center for International Studies, Bob served as Editor in Chief of MIT's Technology Review, then a 10-times-a-year publication with a circulation of 315,000. Bob led the magazine to numerous editorial and design awards and oversaw its expansion into three foreign editions, electronic newsletters, and highly successful conferences. As BusinessWeek's technology editor, he shared in the 1992 National Magazine Award for The Quality Imperative. Bob is the author of four books about technology and innovation. Naval Innovation for the 21st Century (2013) is a post-Cold War account of the Office of Naval Research. Guanxi (2006) focuses on Microsoft's Beijing research lab as a metaphor for global competitiveness. Engines of Tomorrow (2000) describes the evolution of corporate research. The Invention That Changed the World (1996) covered a secret lab at MIT during WWII. Bob served on the Council on Competitiveness-sponsored National Innovation Initiative and is an advisor to the Draper Prize Nominating Committee. He has been a regular guest of CNBC's Strategy Session and has spoken about innovation at many venues, including the Business Council, Amazon, eBay, Google, IBM, and Microsoft.