With Atlas Cash and Berkeley Tools, Intellia Joins the CRISPR Fray

Add another entrant to the race toward what might be called Gene Therapy 2.0.

Atlas Venture and the research arm of the drug giant Novartis (NYSE: [[ticker:NVS]]) have put $15 million into the Series A round for Intellia Therapeutics, which is emerging today from stealth after two years of incubation.

The Cambridge, MA, startup will use a new gene editing technology, known in shorthand as CRISPR/Cas9, to develop human therapeutics. It has exclusive license to a suite of tools and intellectual property developed by a Berkeley, CA, startup called Caribou Biosciences, which has close ties to a scientist, Jennifer Doudna, who might one day win a Nobel Prize for her CRISPR/Cas9 work.

Similar to the adoption of RNA interference more than a decade ago, CRISPR/Cas9 has taken the biomedical research world by storm for its ease of use in modifying the genomes of a range of organisms and animals. (The first monkeys with CRISPR-edited genomes were born earlier this year.)

But will it work on humans? Intellia is joining Editas Medicine, also of Cambridge, and London, UK-based CRISPR Therapeutics as the first startups to try to find out—or at least to say so publicly. Atlas seeded and incubated the firm, or the idea for it, for two years. But only in the past few months did the shape of it—and the incorporation of Caribou’s technology platform—come together.

Intellia’s CEO is Nessan Bermingham (pictured), also a venture partner at Atlas. Other executives include chief scientific officer Thomas Barnes, formerly of Eleven Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ: [[ticker:EBIO]]); chief medical officer John Leonard, the former chief scientific officer at AbbVie (NYSE: [[ticker:ABBV]]); and chief technology officer David Morrissey, who once ran an RNAi research group at Novartis.

Intellia will now compete with Editas and CRISPR Therapeutics, all of whom are building on top of different patent portfolios. All three will be pushing forward as other companies with gene therapy, genome editing, and cell therapy technologies also develop programs.

Years after the first wave of gene therapy efforts crashed under the weight of patient deaths in clinical studies, the Dutch firm UniQure (NASDAQ: [[ticker:QURE]]) kicked off Gene Therapy 2.0 with the field’s first-ever approval: alipogene tiparvovec (Glybera), which the European Union greenlighted in 2012 for the rare disease lipoprotein lipase deficiency.

If Gene Therapy 2.0 is indeed a race, CRISPR/Cas9 companies have to prove their mettle not just against each other but also against other genome-editing technologies. For example, Sangamo Biosciences (NASDAQ: [[ticker:SGMO]]) has made clinical progress with its so-called zinc finger proteins, with high-profile work in HIV now in Phase 2 and a big development deal with Biogen Idec.

CRISPR/Cas9 is far from ready for therapeutic prime time. (Although a group of Harvard Medical School researchers this month published work that described the use of CRISPR/Cas9 to delete two genes from human hematopoetic stem cells.) The basic idea is that researchers send the Cas9 enzyme into a cell’s nucleus with an RNA guide to seek and snip out a defective gene, and perhaps even replace it with a new, functional strand of code, all by triggering the cell’s natural DNA repair mechanisms.

CRISPR/Cas9 (which stands for “clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR associated nuclease 9”) was first found in bacteria, from which it evolved as a defense system against viruses. Then two researchers—Jennifer Doudna of the University of California, Berkeley, and Emmanuelle Charpentier of the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research in Braunschweig, Germany, and the Laboratory for Molecular Infection Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden—made a key modification that suddenly opened up therapeutic possibilities. Their discovery in part was to figure out how to shave the RNA guide down from two nucleic acid strands to one. It was published only two years ago.

In an interesting twist, Doudna is a co-founder of Caribou Biosciences, which spun out of UC Berkeley to commercialize her lab’s work. Caribou has made Intellia its exclusive licensee for all human therapeutic applications. But Doudna herself has no ties to Intellia, according to Caribou CEO Rachel Haurwitz and Intellia CEO Bermingham. Instead, Doudna is a scientific co-founder of Editas—even though Caribou, not Editas, has claim to her foundational work. (Charpentier, meanwhile, has assigned her rights to the foundational work to CRISPR Therapeutics.)

In an interview, CEO Bermingham says the near-term opportunities are in blood-based disorders such as hemophilia and certain cancers. “There are ex vivo applications”—in which the cells are drawn from blood and manipulated outside the patient’s body, then re-infused—“we can address with the technology as it stands today.”

Bermingham declined to give a timeline for getting a therapy into the clinic, but one application he mentioned was chimeric

Author: Alex Lash

I've spent nearly all my working life as a journalist. I covered the rise and fall of the dot-com era in the second half of the 1990s, then switched to life sciences in the new millennium. I've written about the strategy, financing and scientific breakthroughs of biotech for The Deal, Elsevier's Start-Up, In Vivo and The Pink Sheet, and Xconomy.