Déjà Vu for Agios as Second Drug Shines in Small Blood Cancer Study

Agios Pharmaceuticals turned heads in April when it showed its first drug prospect might be able to treat a devastating blood cancer, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in people who have a specific genetic mutation. It was the first shred of validation, in humans, for Agios’s work in a raw field of oncology—cancer metabolism—and the company’s shares have zoomed upwards ever since.

Today, Cambridge, MA-based Agios (NASDAQ: [[ticker:AGIO]]) has unveiled the first clinical data from its second drug, a compound called AG-120. These interim Phase 1 data are critical for Agios, because it owns the U.S. rights to AG-120, unlike the other drug that has already shown promise, known as AG-221. Each drug is designed to treat a different group of AML patients.

It’s important to emphasize that with today’s data, as with the data from AG-221 in April, these are early results from small patient samples.

But they are nonetheless unusual. Phase 1 trials are typically designed to test a drug’s safety and tolerability, find a maximum dose that patients can handle, and determine if a drug is hitting the right molecular target. A drug response, while often measured, isn’t necessarily anticipated—particularly a significant one.

Yet Agios today is reporting that 7 of 14 AML patients have indeed responded to AG-120, with some showing no trace of cancer in their blood after 28 days of treatment. What’s more, no toxicities have emerged to put a ceiling on the size of the dose patients can tolerate.

“When you design a study like this you don’t expect to see multiple complete remissions,” says Agios CEO David Schenkein (pictured above). “This molecule comes on the heels of AG-221, where we saw that activity, so now we were obviously hoping that we’d see this degree of activity [here as well]. But this has certainly exceeded our expectations.”

Agios will expand the trial significantly in the first half of 2015, with more patients taking a specific dose for a longer period of time. It’s déjà vu: after strong early results with AG-221, Agios pushed on with a similar expansion of that Phase 1 trial, as well.

Agios is also eyeing both drugs as treatments for newly-diagnosed AML patients, not just for those who haven’t responded to other therapies.

While the early returns are promising, Agios still doesn’t yet know how long these disease responses will hold up, whether these patients will relapse, if the next group of patients will respond in the same way, or even if some unexpected safety issues will pop up as the study numbers increase.

For now, the one severe side effect investigators saw with AG-120 occurred in one patient who was on the highest dose of the drug and suffered an irregular heartbeat, or “QT prolongation.”

The problem was resolved when the dose was reduced. The patient is still in complete remission and remains on the drug, according to Agios. “We don’t view it as a major issue at this time at all,” says Schenkein. “It’s pretty common in patients with AML because these patients are so sick and on so many other medications.”

But it’s the type of thing to keep an eye on. All of the other side effects have been mild to moderate in nature, and typical of patients with AML, Schenkein says.

AG-120 is designed to work very similarly to AG-221. Unlike chemotherapy, which kills cancer and healthy cells alike, these drugs are supposed to essentially stop the birth of new cancer cells. They target enzymes called isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (IDH2), respectively. Both enzymes help generate energy within cells. But when mutated in cancer, they create a byproduct that flips a genetic switch in immature bone marrow cells.

As a result, rather than becoming platelets or other blood cells they were meant to be, those bone marrow cells don’t develop properly, and start multiplying wildly. AG-120 and AG-221 aim to stop this process by binding to the mutated IDH1 (in the case of AG-120) or IDH2 (for AG-221) enzymes, leading cells to mature normally. Mutated IDH1 is found in about 6 to 10 percent of the patients with AML; Aberrant IDH2 is seen in between 9 to 13 percent, according to Schenkein.

If successful, Agios’s drugs could represent a paradigm shift in treatment for AML, a fast-moving blood cancer that affects about 18,000 people in the U.S. every year and kills most of them. AML patients typically get chemotherapy, which leaves people weak, sick, and prone to infections. The only cure is for the small number of AML patients (about 10 percent, says Schenkein) who are eligible for bone marrow transplants, which carry their own set of risks.

Because AG-120 forces budding cancer cells to grow properly instead of killing them and healthy cells alike, as chemotherapy does, in theory it shouldn’t

Author: Ben Fidler

Ben is former Xconomy Deputy Editor, Biotechnology. He is a seasoned business journalist that comes to Xconomy after a nine-year stint at The Deal, where he covered corporate transactions in industries ranging from biotech to auto parts and gaming. Most recently, Ben was The Deal’s senior healthcare writer, focusing on acquisitions, venture financings, IPOs, partnerships and industry trends in the pharmaceutical, biotech, diagnostics and med tech spaces. Ben wrote features on creative biotech financing models, analyses of middle market and large cap buyouts, spin-offs and restructurings, and enterprise pieces on legal issues such as pay-for-delay agreements and the Affordable Care Act. Before switching to the healthcare beat, Ben was The Deal's senior bankruptcy reporter, covering the restructurings of the Texas Rangers, Phoenix Coyotes, GM, Delphi, Trump Entertainment Resorts and Blockbuster, among others. Ben has a bachelor’s degree in English from Binghamton University.