Name Game: We Review Our Readers’ Choices for Boston’s Most (and Least) Successful Rebrandings

Call it market research, Xconomy style. On Wednesday, we initiated a poll asking our readers to weigh in on whether the rebranding efforts of eight New England startups that had changed their names in the past year worked for them. Readers were asked to pick whether the new name was better, worse, or the same as the old name.

The results are now in (you can find the poll and the results in detail here—voting has been turned off, so the polls are closed). Of course, for those checking in regularly, the results could have been seen at any time, as we have made no effort to hide them. But presuming you aren’t the obsessive type who checks in five times a day, we summarize the findings for you below, along with a bit of interpretation.

Now, I have to put out some caveats. There isn’t much room for nuance and shades of gray in our poll. For instance, while everyone might agree Name B is better than Name A, we have no real way of assessing whether people think Name B is actually a good name. It could be that name A was so bad in the first place that anything else would seem better. Take the Harvard startup originally called Get Out of Cambridge. No doubt GOOC was not intended as a real working name; it sounds more like a student project. But as a company name, it is pretty awful. I am amazed that 19 percent thought the new name—gtrot, short for globetrotting—was worse.

But with caveats aside, let’s look at how things shook out. First, here is a list of the old and new so you can see everything at a glance:

Paragon Lake – Gemvara (Online jewelry customization and sales)

uLocate – Where (Local search apps for mobile phones)

RunMyErrand – TaskRabbit (Errand running service)

HopSkipConnect – Healthrageous (Mobile health technology and services)

Datanetis – Pursway (Influencer marketing)

Droid Works – CyPhy Works (Unmanned aerial vehicles)

TwitVid – Vidly (Video sharing on Twitter and the web)

Get Out of Cambridge – gtrot (Social media application for booking and sharing travel plans)

The good news is that in our readers’ view, the majority of company name changes—five out of eight—were clear improvements. The biggest exception was Cy Phy Works (old name Droid Works), the unmanned aerial vehicle startup founded by iRobot co-founder (and Xconomist) Helen Greiner. Some 61 percent of our readers saw the new name as worse than the original. Only 28.5 percent saw it as better, with the rest saying there was no real change.

The other non-winners were Where (old name uLocate) and Pursway (previously Datanetis). In Where’s case, 46 percent of voters saw the new name as an improvement, 39 percent saw it as worse, and 14 percent thought there was no real difference. A slight victory for Where, but not really, considering all the trouble and expense of rebranding. For Pursway, only 34 percent saw the new name as better, while 42 percent saw no real change. My own assessment is that the company has shifted from one bad name to another. You really don’t get what the startup is about from either name, and there isn’t anything memorable about them. (By the way, Wade, who edited this piece, thought the new name was supposed to be about persuading or swaying influencers, and therefore should have been spelled “Persway,” whereas I thought it was about getting people to spend more, evoking the word “purse.” Obviously, there is some big confusion there.)

The runaway winner was Gemvara (old name Paragon Lake). This startup is focused on online jewelry customization and sales, which you definitely don’t get from Paragon Lake. So no surprise that such a vast majority thought something with “gem” in the name was an improvement. An impressive 71 percent of our voters saw the new name as better, with only 18 percent seeing it as worse. Right behind it was gtrot (nee the aforementioned Get Out of Cambridge), with 69.5 percent of voters seeing the new name as an improvement. I personally don’t think gtrot (too close to “gspot?”) is very good, but like I said, it is better than GOOC.

My own choice for best name change was TaskRabbit. I actually liked the original RunMyErrand just fine. But I think TaskRabbit is friendlier, more memorable, and better captures the psyche of the Internet age.

Thanks to our readers-poll takers for helping us out on our market research!


Author: Robert Buderi

Bob is Xconomy's founder and chairman. He is one of the country's foremost journalists covering business and technology. As a noted author and magazine editor, he is a sought-after commentator on innovation and global competitiveness. Before taking his most recent position as a research fellow in MIT's Center for International Studies, Bob served as Editor in Chief of MIT's Technology Review, then a 10-times-a-year publication with a circulation of 315,000. Bob led the magazine to numerous editorial and design awards and oversaw its expansion into three foreign editions, electronic newsletters, and highly successful conferences. As BusinessWeek's technology editor, he shared in the 1992 National Magazine Award for The Quality Imperative. Bob is the author of four books about technology and innovation. Naval Innovation for the 21st Century (2013) is a post-Cold War account of the Office of Naval Research. Guanxi (2006) focuses on Microsoft's Beijing research lab as a metaphor for global competitiveness. Engines of Tomorrow (2000) describes the evolution of corporate research. The Invention That Changed the World (1996) covered a secret lab at MIT during WWII. Bob served on the Council on Competitiveness-sponsored National Innovation Initiative and is an advisor to the Draper Prize Nominating Committee. He has been a regular guest of CNBC's Strategy Session and has spoken about innovation at many venues, including the Business Council, Amazon, eBay, Google, IBM, and Microsoft.